I don’t get a whole lot of the very top students from high schools in my college classes because most of those kids are not going to mid-range public schools, even a small state flagship like mine. But you do need what the culture of high school does to kids, which is to create a ridiculous amount of stress over a decision that quite frankly DOES NOT MATTER. That decision of course is which excellent college you go to. They are all the same, unless your 18 year old has a very specific niche career desire. You want to go into marine issues, URI is a superb destination for your kid. You want to become a vet–go to Washington State. Most schools have a niche or two like this, but in the end, it barely matters for 90% of the kids. That’s not to say that students shouldn’t think it matters whether they go to Princeton or Western Oregon, yes, obviously there are differences. But especially at the elite level of education, or really at any level, schools clustered around the same quality are all exactly the same and it’s total nonsense to push kids through this punishing high school scheudle to improve those college apps when any college graduate with even passable grades is going to do just fine in the world.

I have seen this at the more elite level with my in-laws and their friends and let me tell you what I have noticed. This is not about the kids. It’s about bragging rights among their Wall Street friends. I have interjected in these discussions several times with some facts about this stuff, but the parents don’t care and don’t want to hear me. They want to debate whether Vassar, Swarthmore, or Williams would be better for their kid, as if it matters which of these excellent schools one chooses! It’s not a life or death decision!!!! But good luck getting that through Elite Bragging Rights land.

Tim Donahue, who teaches at one of these fancy high schools. on what this does to kids:

To earn the distinction of valedictorian at Sunny Hills High School in Fullerton, Calif., a student must maintain a straight-A average and take at least 32 honors-level, semester-long classes. One weak “Gatsby” essay during these four years, one math test taken after an ankle sprain, one poorly conjugated verb can put a leak in the boat. And yet this past May, 39 of the 606 graduating seniors maintained the buoyancy to become valedictorians.

This is hardly unusual. In 2022, Edison High in Fresno, Calif., had 115 valedictorians in the class of 558. In 2017, Central Magnet School in Murfreesboro, Tenn., had 48 out of 193. And in 2019, Washington Liberty High in Arlington, Va., had 213 earning the top honor in their class of 595.

In the way some teachers sniff out A.I.-generated essays, some colleges engage in “countermeasures” to decode the truth behind the ever-increasing numbers of ever-improving transcripts they read. But the bigger truth is that many colleges just throw up their hands and don’t factor in weighted G.P.A.s (scaled according to the difficulty of the class) at all. So the same students who are now sweating on the too-hot turf during early-season practices are going to sweat through lots and lots of classes whose contents they can’t possibly retain in order to simply tread water.

We have pushed high school students into maximizing every part of their days and nights. Those who take the bait are remarkably compliant, diluting themselves between their internships and Canva presentations. We condition students to do a so-so job and then move on to the next thing. We need to let them slow down. Critical cognition, by definition, takes time.

The underbelly of grade inflation is that now the ambitious student must clear more time in their schedule for the stuff that really makes a difference. Harvard’s dean of undergraduate education, Amanda Claybaugh, said: “Students feel the need to distinguish themselves outside the classroom because they are essentially indistinguishable inside the classroom. Extracurriculars, which should be stress-relieving, become stress-producing.”

And then the kids get to college and they are completely burned out. For what?

And so what is really being squeezed out is the value of reflection.

Consider what slowing down to think about this passage from Henry David Thoreau can do. He’s musing on the origin of the word “saunter”: “Some, however, would derive the word from ‘sans terre,’ without land or a home, which, therefore, in the good sense, will mean having no particular home, but equally at home everywhere. For this is the secret of successful sauntering. He who sits still in a house all the time may be the greatest vagrant of all; but the saunterer, in the good sense, is no more vagrant than the meandering river, which is all the while sedulously seeking the shortest course to the sea.”

Let’s not forget that exploration is the catalyst of learning. If we allow for more unbroken stretches of time, we begin to see those meadows that have been in front of us the whole while. When students are allowed uninterrupted thought, they can build ideas together. A gut reaction to a character’s monologue can lead to understanding of another passage, which can lead students to connect not only with fiction but also with one another.

What was once invisible becomes apparent; sustained thought offers a grounding and an ascension. Molly Worthen, a history professor at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, is pretty adamant about this: “We need an intervention: maybe not a vow of silence but a bold move to put the screens, the pinging notifications and the creepy humanoid A.I. chatbots in their proper place.”

Of course, how does sustained thought please the donors who run colleges and universities these days? That might lead the kids to not want to work in corporate America?!!!!!

The post The Ridiculousness of Modern High School Education appeared first on Lawyers, Guns & Money.

One of the oldest craft breweries in British Columbia is shutting down its main facility and outsourcing production and packaging duties to a nearby brewery, citing a large hike in rent at its Victoria location. 

IBM spent a fortune fighting calls for them to be broken up. So did AT&T and Microsoft.

In all three cases, there’s plenty of evidence that they would have been better off if they had simply broken themselves up. Microsoft is still recovering and IBM never will.

One computer company, one phone company, one software company, one search engine… It doesn’t last.

If these companies had intentionally divided up, customers would benefit, so would shareholders and most of the leadership of each organization. Perhaps a few dozen people had a lot at stake in maintaining a mythical sort of scale, and they wasted time and money trying to maintain it.

The company is more than just the few people who run it. And the benefits the organization creates extend beyond the people in the C suite.

In the short run, enforced dominance can offer rewards, both financial and related to ego, mostly to senior management.

But the short run is fairly short, and the resilience, productivity and utility that come from agility and serving customers and employees more effectively is worth the transition.

The very thing that enabled these companies to succeed disappears once they seek to obtain bigness at any cost. MBAs take over, and the focus that led to success disappears.

Buying a big publishing company like Simon and Schuster wasn’t the smart way for a giant publishing company like Penguin to succeed. They’d be better off dividing into agile silos that can focus on the work that needs to be done.

Google’s a monopoly, and has been for years. As a result, they’ve made decisions that weren’t informed by what was best for their users or team members, and they’ve missed countless opportunities to create value, simply because they were prioritizing something else.

The same is true for the local business that has enough scale to act like a bully. A restaurant or real estate broker or distributor that tries to corner the market ends up spending time cornering, not serving, the market.

Adversarial interoperability creates productivity and value. And having a smaller part of a more vibrant market is far better than dominating a moribund one.

Click here to go see the bonus panel!

Hovertext:
If you're having trouble, he's roughly in the middle of the page.

Today's News:

Disney is going full Black Mirror in a new lawsuit that’s bizarre and distressing on a global scale, but also just really sad. The suit comes from a former Disney World guest named Jeffrey Piccolo, who alleges that his wife, an NYU doctor named Kanokporn Tangsuan, died as a result of a severe allergic reaction she suffered shortly after at a restaurant on the property last October. According to the New York Post, Piccolo is suing for $50,000 in damages under Florida’s wrongful death act, in addition to mental pain and suffering, loss of income, and funeral expenses.Disney is trying to get the suit thrown out, however, because of a clause in the user agreement for the month-long Disney+ free trial Piccolo signed up for on his Playstation in 2019. Yes, really. Apparently, there’s a section in the fine print (that we’ve likely all agreed to) stating that any dispute with the company—with the exception of small claims—will be “resolved by individual binding arbitration.” According to court filings viewed by NYP, the company also pointed out that Piccolo signed off on similar language when he downloaded the “My Disney Experience” app in September to purchase tickets to Epcot for his trip. Disney is using both of these agreements to insist that Piccolo settle out of court.Piccolo’s lawyers, of course, are arguing that Disney’s position is “preposterous” and “fatally flawed.” “The notion that terms agreed to by a consumer when creating a Disney+ free trial account would forever bar that consumer’s right to a jury trial in any dispute with any Disney affiliate or subsidiary, is so outrageously unreasonable and unfair as to shock the judicial conscience, and this court should not enforce such an agreement,” they wrote in an August 2 motion. Even though they shouldn’t have to point this out in the first place, the lawyers have also argued that Piccolo originally filed his wrongful death suit as the “personal representative of the estate of Kanokporn Tangsuan,” and not on behalf of himself; therefore, the terms and conditions he signed shouldn’t apply. The real kicker here is that all of this is happening over $50,000. Disney just reported $23.2 billion in revenue from its third quarter earnings. Surely, the happiest place on earth could have spared what’s essentially pennies from that amount for a grieving widower without going full Cruella de Vil.

Kamala Harris Joins Trump in proposing no tax on tips. This is what I think will happen.